Monday 16 May 2011

SHHH!!! SPOILERS! (PART ONE)

During the course of the following babblings there will be a moment when I definitely claim to have an opinion on something, there will be a passing reference to pornography that will no doubt disappoint its many fans, and an unnamed former colleague of mine will not be named and shamed despite me feeling that he probably deserves to be. Oh yes, and there’s a bit right at the end which refers to wrist-slapping which probably won’t turn out to be half as interesting as it probably sounds. I hope that knowing all that doesn’t ruin the experience of reading today’s witterings, but instead entices you and intrigues you enough to make you want to read more…

A couple of days back, I had the misfortune to read an internet spat about so-called ‘spoilers’, those little snippets of information that tend to leak out and ‘spoil’ the enjoyment of a storyline unfolding at its proper pace for television shows. Personally I would prefer to call them “ruiners” myself, but then that’s probably just me. Just in case you haven’t guessed already, well, I suppose that I should clamber down off the fence and nail my colours firmly to the mast, whilst wondering, not unreasonably I feel, quite what the heck a fence is doing on the good ship “Mixed Meta 4” anyway.

Anyway, I flippin’ well detest spoilers. There, I’ve been and gone and said it now, haven’t I? There’s no hanging about, we’ve got straight to the point. I utterly, utterly loathe them. When it comes to a story, on TV, in a film or even a book, I’d rather know absolutely nothing in advance and be totally (and hopefully delightfully) surprised by the twists and turns of that story unfolding as per the writers’ and/or directors’ intentions than be able to sit there and smugly say to myself that I know exactly what’s about to happen in a piece of drama that’s supposed to be entertaining me. Isn’t part of the entertainment the fact that it can surprise you? Doesn’t that add hugely to the enjoyment and satisfaction of the experience?

I never really understand the almost pornographic glee that magazines and newspapers containing articles about soap operas seem to display in telling everyone the most specific details of the upcoming episodes and plot lines, sometimes months in advance. There’s an argument that this builds up the anticipation almost to the point of a frenzy and that, of course, ultimately pays off in terms of the ratings (and newspaper sales), but surely there would be more enjoyment if you were taken completely delightfully by surprise by a twist in a storyline that you thought you understood so well that it had become almost mundane or ordinary???

Is it perhaps something about the way the mind of the soap opera fan works? It seems incredible to me because I don’t follow any of them, but there are so many people whose enjoyment of those programmes actually seems to be enhanced by the advanced knowledge of how things are going to turn out. Maybe it’s a deep-seated desire to have a sense of satisfaction that things are unfolding as they should, or maybe it’s a need to know what is going to happen but not quite know how it is going to unfold. Maybe it comes from a generation of video game players wanting to ‘solve’ things and knowing that there’s a ‘right’ direction things are going to go in, or perhaps it comes from growing up in an environment where you could watch a film over and over again, as often as you wanted to. It is perfectly possible that the pre-home video generations just wanted different things from their storytelling. However, I’ve heard it said that a great many people apparently choose to read the end of a book before they start to actually read it, although that really doesn’t make a lot of sense to me, especially if you’re reading a “whodunnit”. I don’t know, perhaps people want to feel ‘safe’ with their entertainment media, or maybe that’s why watching sport is so much more popular these days because it still has the capacity to surprise you when the result is an unknown.

Spoilers about hearing the football results before you settle down to watch the game you recorded are the stuff that legends (and “Likely Lads” plots) are made of. I fully remember making a phone call to congratulate someone about some result or other I knew would mean a lot to them only to find out that they were about to sit down and watch the recording they’d just made of it because they’d been out. Perhaps this is one of the many reasons why I seldom ring people up any more.

Surely some of the most memorable “TV Moments” in history are memorable precisely because no-one saw them coming? The final episode of “Blake’s 7” springs immediately to my awkward, geekish, nerdy old mind here, but there used to be so many others; Henry Blake in “M*A*S*H” and Robert Powell in “DoomWatch” being just two of the others that come immediately to mind. These are the events that become part of the shared culture of a generation and the stuff of TV legend.

How much more of a shock would it have been to those young fans of the revived “Dr Who” if Christopher Eccleston’s sudden unexpected departure at the end of that first series had managed to have remained a complete surprise to the viewing millions? Oops! Spoiled that now, haven’t I? Or have I? Wouldn’t the excited chatter in the playground on the following Monday have been the stuff they would look back on as being one of the most magical television moments of their young lives?

Now that I’ve got myself all worked up, I’ve begun to realise that this particular epic has started to go on far too long, and I’ve not even got round to many of the things I promised you in my opening paragraph. This will have to mean that, in order to make it even remotely bearable, I’m going to have to split it in half and leave you on some kind of almighty cliff…


NEXT TIME: “How do you tease people…?” “There’s a good bit at the end, well, not really the end, but near the end…” “Always got a boost from his colleagues…” “There’s a twist at the end” “It’s the old problem…”  “My friend’s arm had unwittingly taken much of the brunt of it instead…” “I’m going to let myself off with little more than a slap on the wrist….”

“SHHH!!! SPOILERS! (PART TWO)” - the eagerly anticipated and ultimately disappointing, bloated and over-long sequel, coming soon to Lesser Blogfordshire…

3 comments:

  1. MAWH, I know you are not a footy fan so you will probably be disappointed to hear that I am a long time & long suffering season ticket holder at Macclesfield Town FC. Well someone has to support them. I am also a fan of BBC's Match of the Day; so much so that I intend to have the signature tune played at my funeral. I despise much about the shenanigans at the top level of the game but the skills on show provide a perfect counterpoint to the honest endeavour show by the Silkmen and their ilk in the humble environs of League Two. So as I trudge dejectedly and inevitably away from another home defeat at 4:45 my spirits are slightly lifted in anticipation of my appointment with Mr Lineker and his chums at 10:30.
    So what has all this to do with your excellent piece on spoilers? Well, in order to fully enjoy the delights of MOTD one has to avoid all the Premier league results. As the Likely Lads discovered all those years ago this is not a simple matter. In fact, the age of technology & instant, multi-channel communication has made it even more of a challenge. My half time routine has become familiar to those who regularly sit with me and around me in the lavish surroundings of the McAlpine stand. As soon as the PA crackles into life I am on my guard. The first mention of a Premiership team has me with my fingers in my ears humming a tuneless rendition of the MOTD theme tune. Amazingly, this embarrassing routine seems to work most weeks. Terry & Bob would have been proud of me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Just what did happen in the final episode of Blake's Seven?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Brilliant, lloydy, quite brilliant.

    The last episode of Blake's 7 involved (SPOILER ALERT!) a tragedy involving a spark off one of the polyester outfits igniting the cardboard scenery and burning down half of Television Centre. This was deducted from the programme's own budget and they could never afford to make any more episodes and were replaced by an extra season of "Triangle" instead.

    (This may be all a huge fib). M.

    ReplyDelete