Showing posts with label Spoilers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Spoilers. Show all posts

Thursday, 7 August 2014

SPOILER ALERT

If you're prepared to put on your best "Kroton"/mildly Afrikaans voice, you can repeat after me:

"THIS IS A WARRRR-NING!!!"

This is a Zero Tolerance situation… and there can be No Exceptions.

Even though I know it's just a bit of silly old telly and therefore not important, it is actually rather important to me at any rate, so there we are.

Until August 23rd, I will be on a total "anti-spoiler" lockdown, and even the merest hint of a clue as to what is likely unfold will be deemed punishable by at least some form of excommunication, even if it was done in all innocence and under the misguided belief that "everyone knows that already".

Some of us don't… and some of us really don't want to.

Some of us still like our telly to come along and surprise us from time-to-time.

Ruin this for me and I will neither forgive nor forget it.

There will be consequences. Granted they may only be consequences which involve me shouting and swearing a lot and vowing eternal vengeance upon which I am very unlikely to deliver, but consequences nevertheless...

I'm that kind of a man...

And don't expect me to answer the phone for the duration, either.

I mean, I know that I've made some mistakes…. but does that give you the right to punish me for it…?



Tuesday, 17 May 2011

SHHH!!! SPOILERS! (PART TWO)

(Whaddaya mean “You never saw part one”…? Honestly…)

“Previously in Lesser Blogfordshire…”

“I definitely claim to have an opinion on something…” “A passing reference to pornography…” “It’s a deep-seated desire…” “A sense of satisfaction…” “Watching sport is so much more popular these days…” “My awkward, geekish nerdy old mind…” “Now that I’ve got myself all worked up…” “I’m going to have to split it in half and leave you on some kind of almighty cliff…”

“And now, the concluding part of  ‘SHHH!!! SPOILERS!’...”

…hanger, which will be very easily resolved, as you always knew it would because you probably saw all the publicity that got shown between parts one and two showing everyone who was in peril at the end of last week’s episode alive and well and running about in scenes you hadn’t yet seen.

What’s that? You didn’t see those? I don’t know! The budget must have run out again... Never mind. You probably weren’t missing much anyway, and it might very well have spoiled the surprise for you. It’s the old problem… how do you tease people into returning without showing them everything that they’re returning to see…?

I used to work in an office where one bloke used to ruin films for everyone as a matter of course and really didn’t seem to think that anyone would mind. He’d just sit there, chatting to his mates at the top of his voice, blatantly telling you (if you were unlucky enough to be within earshot) all the key plot points and significant events of the movie he’d been to see the previous day as if, just because he’d seen the wretched thing, he assumed everyone else must have done too. A few years of this kind of thing going on eventually meant that the opening weekend takings at our local flea-pit always got a boost from his colleagues because we all had to go on the opening weekend if a big film was coming out, so as not to have it completely ruined for us on the following Monday morning.

Of course, then the so-and-so started going to ‘special previews’ just so he could say he had seen something first, so that plan got ruined too because we didn’t even have the luxury of the ‘weekend buffer zone’ so rescue us. Later on, to make things even worse, he started to invest in the wicked practice of acquiring ‘bootleg’ DVDs of movies still to be released in this country, just, I always suspected, so that his kids could have “I’ve already seen that” bragging rights in the school playground. This, I fear, was a place from which I feel that he never truly escaped from himself. I was never able to shame him out of encouraging this despicable industry either, despite all the evidence of its unpleasant nature, because he always had a rather compelling fiscal argument to counter it with; it was cheaper to buy one of those than to pay to take the whole family out to the cinema.

There really is no answer to that. The even stranger thing is that, in general, we actually got on fairly well, but, nevertheless, when it comes to the matter of ‘spoilers’ then I simply will not take any prisoners. Interestingly, it was also that very same chap who managed to ruin a film series for me before some of the films had even been made, because he mentioned something that happened at the end of one of the books it was based upon and really didn’t think it mattered because “everyone” already knew what happened. Or so he thought. I, of course, hadn’t read the books, but had been to see each of the movie adaptations that had so far been released and which were at that point running about three books behind. Grrrr!

One of the most notorious ‘get out’ clauses he eventually developed, after being harangued by the rest of us once too often, was the “There’s a good bit at the end, well, not really the end, but near the end…” gambit which seemed, in his mind, to mean that it was okay to spill pretty much all of the beans, but few of us had much patience with that approach either. Whilst we haven’t worked together for nearly five years now, nowadays I think things could be much, much worse as I generally only watch ‘new’ movies (well, new to me anyway) on rental discs as I seem to have got out of that old habit of ‘going to the cinema’ and the incredible time-lag opportunities involved with that would be just ripe for dumping entire plots into.

Mind you, professional reviewers can be just as bad. Saying that “There’s a twist at the end” seems such an innocent phrase, but it can still completely ruin a movie for me, as I’ll then be looking for it, but even a slight slip, or a less than guarded choice of phrase chosen for the article or by an interviewer or actor on one of the film preview shows can instantly put me on my guard. Just as much annoying is knowing just a tiny bit of knowledge or a half heard hint which can make you realise that you already know something you shouldn’t about the fate of a character. I tend towards the view that just as you don’t know what’s going to happen next in real life, neither should you when you sit down to a new experience in storytelling. It’s not fair, and in some cases it can truly remove any potential enjoyment of it for me.

When I look back upon all the fondest memories I have of the cinema it is the films that shocked or surprised me that still stand out in my memory. My first viewings of classic thrillers like “Jagged Edge” or horror films like “Aliens” still remain vivid experiences even after all these years. I remember being so tense whilst first watching “Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom” that I dug my nails deep into the chair arm of my cinema seat and only found out afterwards that my friend’s arm had unwittingly taken much of the brunt of it instead. The escape sequence in “The Silence of the Lambs” I still remember as being all the more enjoyably terrifying because of not having any clue beforehand about what was going to happen. I even managed to avoid the plot of “The Usual Suspects” until someone lent me the video.

Perhaps that’s the only solution; to be so out of the “pop culture” loop that no-one bothers actually telling you, although in the internet age it seems more and more unlikely that these things can remain a ‘secret’ for very long, but even in the old days you had to be very wary of the ‘professional spoilers’. When I went to an afternoon screening of “Alien 3” on the day it opened, I was appalled that a couple of mean-spirited so-and-sos deliberately chose to leave the only previous showing (which had started a mere twenty minutes earlier) in order to sit at the back of the cinema I was in and speak every line of dialogue at the top of their lungs just a few seconds before it was stated on screen. Why anyone would wish to do that is completely beyond me, except for that sense of self-satisfaction that might come from feeling you can say “I’ve already seen this” to those that haven’t.

Equally the “pop culture” references in shows like “The Simpsons and “Family Guy” can completely ruin a film I haven’t seen as all those references are made upon the quite reasonable assumption that most of us will have already seen the films in question, although even I reckon that the big “reveal” in “The Empire Strikes Back” is probably widely enough known now for it not to matter any more… Not that I’m going to tell you what it is, of course, although “Luke’s Blog” (http://bit.ly/jFR9n5) written way back in November might give you a bit of a clue…

Granted, I do tend to think that there should be a statute of limitations on these things. I innocently ruined “Thelma & Louise” for someone ten years after its release on the assumption that everyone who really wanted to had probably seen it by then, but I once got shouted at by a friend for even discussing the events of  “Psycho” forty years after it was first released and that particular someone who hadn’t even been born when it first came out. Equally, I’ve never personally seen “The Sixth Sense” but I’m pretty sure I know most of what happens and the ‘big reveal’ is now such a well-known cliché that it would have been almost impossible for a movie fan to have got this far without knowing what it is.

Mind you, I’ve never even seen “E.T.” for various reasons of personal choice, and there’s now only a select and dwindling band of us who can still honestly make that claim. It used to be one of the ‘pointed’ questions I would ask to discern the character of new people whenever I met them.

This probably explains quite a lot…

Some other M Night Shyamalan’s films were ruined for me because I went to see them fully expecting a twist and found myself looking for it (and finding it) as I watched the film. In one case - rather tragically I fear - it involved the anachronistic window furniture in some greenhouses seen in the opening seconds leading to a correct guess as to what the twist might be, but then, if you watch these things knowing that there is likely to be a twist of any sort, then your mind is probably already attuned to look out for these things. I’ve seen so many episodes of US crime dramas now that I can usually spot who the mysterious killer is the moment they appear on my TV screen, but it still wouldn’t make me any good at being a real detective.

I did make one exception, and I was a lot younger and a lot more foolish when I did it, so I think I’m going to let myself off with little more than a slap on the wrist. I was so invested in the character of Michael Corleone having enjoyed the first two “Godfather” films that I knew that I really wouldn’t be able to bear the tension of “Part Three” as it unfolded if his fate was uncertain, so I waited years before I finally watched it on a borrowed videocassette, and have to confess that I did manage to find out just enough to make the film bearable without ruining it for myself completely.

Nevertheless, I guess that that revelation comes as a bit of a bombshell to end on, after all I’ve said…

Bish! Bash! Bosh! Da-da-da-da-Dum!!





Monday, 16 May 2011

SHHH!!! SPOILERS! (PART ONE)

During the course of the following babblings there will be a moment when I definitely claim to have an opinion on something, there will be a passing reference to pornography that will no doubt disappoint its many fans, and an unnamed former colleague of mine will not be named and shamed despite me feeling that he probably deserves to be. Oh yes, and there’s a bit right at the end which refers to wrist-slapping which probably won’t turn out to be half as interesting as it probably sounds. I hope that knowing all that doesn’t ruin the experience of reading today’s witterings, but instead entices you and intrigues you enough to make you want to read more…

A couple of days back, I had the misfortune to read an internet spat about so-called ‘spoilers’, those little snippets of information that tend to leak out and ‘spoil’ the enjoyment of a storyline unfolding at its proper pace for television shows. Personally I would prefer to call them “ruiners” myself, but then that’s probably just me. Just in case you haven’t guessed already, well, I suppose that I should clamber down off the fence and nail my colours firmly to the mast, whilst wondering, not unreasonably I feel, quite what the heck a fence is doing on the good ship “Mixed Meta 4” anyway.

Anyway, I flippin’ well detest spoilers. There, I’ve been and gone and said it now, haven’t I? There’s no hanging about, we’ve got straight to the point. I utterly, utterly loathe them. When it comes to a story, on TV, in a film or even a book, I’d rather know absolutely nothing in advance and be totally (and hopefully delightfully) surprised by the twists and turns of that story unfolding as per the writers’ and/or directors’ intentions than be able to sit there and smugly say to myself that I know exactly what’s about to happen in a piece of drama that’s supposed to be entertaining me. Isn’t part of the entertainment the fact that it can surprise you? Doesn’t that add hugely to the enjoyment and satisfaction of the experience?

I never really understand the almost pornographic glee that magazines and newspapers containing articles about soap operas seem to display in telling everyone the most specific details of the upcoming episodes and plot lines, sometimes months in advance. There’s an argument that this builds up the anticipation almost to the point of a frenzy and that, of course, ultimately pays off in terms of the ratings (and newspaper sales), but surely there would be more enjoyment if you were taken completely delightfully by surprise by a twist in a storyline that you thought you understood so well that it had become almost mundane or ordinary???

Is it perhaps something about the way the mind of the soap opera fan works? It seems incredible to me because I don’t follow any of them, but there are so many people whose enjoyment of those programmes actually seems to be enhanced by the advanced knowledge of how things are going to turn out. Maybe it’s a deep-seated desire to have a sense of satisfaction that things are unfolding as they should, or maybe it’s a need to know what is going to happen but not quite know how it is going to unfold. Maybe it comes from a generation of video game players wanting to ‘solve’ things and knowing that there’s a ‘right’ direction things are going to go in, or perhaps it comes from growing up in an environment where you could watch a film over and over again, as often as you wanted to. It is perfectly possible that the pre-home video generations just wanted different things from their storytelling. However, I’ve heard it said that a great many people apparently choose to read the end of a book before they start to actually read it, although that really doesn’t make a lot of sense to me, especially if you’re reading a “whodunnit”. I don’t know, perhaps people want to feel ‘safe’ with their entertainment media, or maybe that’s why watching sport is so much more popular these days because it still has the capacity to surprise you when the result is an unknown.

Spoilers about hearing the football results before you settle down to watch the game you recorded are the stuff that legends (and “Likely Lads” plots) are made of. I fully remember making a phone call to congratulate someone about some result or other I knew would mean a lot to them only to find out that they were about to sit down and watch the recording they’d just made of it because they’d been out. Perhaps this is one of the many reasons why I seldom ring people up any more.

Surely some of the most memorable “TV Moments” in history are memorable precisely because no-one saw them coming? The final episode of “Blake’s 7” springs immediately to my awkward, geekish, nerdy old mind here, but there used to be so many others; Henry Blake in “M*A*S*H” and Robert Powell in “DoomWatch” being just two of the others that come immediately to mind. These are the events that become part of the shared culture of a generation and the stuff of TV legend.

How much more of a shock would it have been to those young fans of the revived “Dr Who” if Christopher Eccleston’s sudden unexpected departure at the end of that first series had managed to have remained a complete surprise to the viewing millions? Oops! Spoiled that now, haven’t I? Or have I? Wouldn’t the excited chatter in the playground on the following Monday have been the stuff they would look back on as being one of the most magical television moments of their young lives?

Now that I’ve got myself all worked up, I’ve begun to realise that this particular epic has started to go on far too long, and I’ve not even got round to many of the things I promised you in my opening paragraph. This will have to mean that, in order to make it even remotely bearable, I’m going to have to split it in half and leave you on some kind of almighty cliff…


NEXT TIME: “How do you tease people…?” “There’s a good bit at the end, well, not really the end, but near the end…” “Always got a boost from his colleagues…” “There’s a twist at the end” “It’s the old problem…”  “My friend’s arm had unwittingly taken much of the brunt of it instead…” “I’m going to let myself off with little more than a slap on the wrist….”

“SHHH!!! SPOILERS! (PART TWO)” - the eagerly anticipated and ultimately disappointing, bloated and over-long sequel, coming soon to Lesser Blogfordshire…

Friday, 13 May 2011

SPOILER ALERT!


I was going to publish a short piece I’d started writing about ‘spoilers’ today but then, as it turned out, I found I had far much more to say about the subject than I originally thought I did and, as I rattled on past the end of the fourth single-spaced page of my deathless prose, I realised that I was going to have to split those witterings into a two-part burble if I was even going to have the remotest chance of holding your attention with my thoughts on the matter.

Doing the surgery required to satisfyingly reshape that particular discussion into a more balanced double-barrelled argument, or possibly just an argument with a sequel, is going to take a little bit of time, so, instead I found myself thinking about ‘teasers’ and ‘trailers’ instead, which I suppose means that the whole thing is rapidly spinning out of control into a three-parter (or even a ‘trilogy’) of which this now forms a part even if only as a sort of prologue, (or, if you will ‘prequel’) and the whole sorry mess will probably now need judicious pruning if it is to even stand the remotest chance of not boring you to tears.

If that’s not enough for you, however, just wait for the ‘special edition extended cut’ six months from now, which will probably approach novel length and not tell you any more than the original, almost comparatively ‘pithy’ version will, but with it you might just get to see the rare deleted scene where my lips form just the tiniest hint of the slightest of smiles. Mind you, if that’s the kind of thing that would get your juices flowing, then god help you…

Teaser campaigns are now the acceptable face of subliminal advertising. You know the sort of thing. A five to ten second glimpse into a world that might still be in the process of being filmed, designed to get the anticipation building up even before the full-length trailers start to appear; A phrase like “Coming soon” written in a specific typeface designed to trigger an association and make you realise an old favourite is returning; or just a glimpse of something or someone familiar that you thought had been totally wiped out in part one. Sometimes these appear alongside a specific date or a more general mention of a season of the year which might still be months away but is now tagged in your mind as an ‘event’ to look forward to.

When the trailers begin to become available for viewing, sometimes the final special effects sequences haven’t been finished yet so you get all the ‘talky’ exposition bits which can be quite ruinous or equally quite compelling as you try to make sense of a whole jigsaw of revelations. Later on the full-blown trailer showing all the very best bits of the film will come along and either drive you up to a level of anticipation bordering on ‘fever pitch’ persuading you that you really want to see it “Now! Now! Now!” or else it might very well tell you the entire plot, ruin the whole thing for you and even end up being a slightly more satisfying experience than the actual film itself ends up being.

I can’t believe it when I see old trailers from the 1930s, 40s and 50s. It’s truly astonishing how much of the plot they will actually tell you, sometimes you’ll see some of the final shoot out in a Bogart movie for example, victims and all, so they’re best avoided if you buy the DVD and haven’t watched the film yet. I suppose it was a different world back in the days when those films were being made and both marketing and editing techniques were more primitive too, and the ‘best’ way to approach such things was still being learnt. Equally, the film could still have been months away from release and, because going to the cinema was what people did before they had televisions, I suppose that you might very well have forgotten just one trailer you once saw amongst all the double features, cartoons and newsreels.

Nowadays, the trailer has now become a more sophisticated animal, although some of them still commit the cardinal error of ruining the entire movie that they’re supposed to be promoting. At best, a trailer is a short montage of very good moments that manage to tell you nothing except that this is something that you really feel you’d like to see.

My own thoughts upon ‘spoilers’ I will share with you on another couple of mornings, but in the meantime, here are a few highlights to whet your appetite…

“I definitely claim to have an opinion on something…” “A passing reference to pornography…” “It’s a deep-seated desire…” “A sense of satisfaction…” “Watching sport is so much more popular these days…” “My awkward, geekish nerdy old mind…” “Now that I’ve got myself all worked up…”
“SHHH!!! SPOILERS!” Coming soon!

Hold on. Do you see what I did there…?