Tuesday 28 August 2012

LIKE FOR LIKE (EMBRACE THE FUTURE)

One of the strange quirks of being robbed is the concept of the “like for like” replacement in terms of insurance payouts. Normally, this is a good thing. The stolen items might no longer be available and, perhaps to ease the gnawing sense of horror at having been robbed in the first place, a newer, shinier, “upgraded” version of what was lost can help to make things seem just a little bit better.

Anything unique, of course, is utterly irreplaceable. I still have a slight “pang” every time I think about my late father’s silver pocket watch and that went “out of the window” due to the actions of “person or persons unknown” (who may or may not have been future rock stars) over twenty years ago.

The real issue with that, of course, is that even if someone were to magically restore it to me tomorrow, I couldn’t be one hundred percent sure that it was the same one because I have no photographs of it, I don’t recall it being engraved in any way and for most of the time I had the thing it was kept in a box in a drawer, and the only thing about it that I remember clearly was the bit of string that was tied the winding key to the fob chain, and the glass face that opened up and closed in an interesting way. Well, it fascinated me when I was a small person, anyway…

It was just that it was once my dad’s and now, like him. It’s gone forever…

There is always the tricky matter that the swines who stole your stuff in the first place might come back and steel your new stuff just as soon as you’ve had the chance to get it, but it is sheer madness to live your life under the assumption that they will. You have to get on with your life and, whilst fearing the worst, you must hope for the best.

The difficulty with “like-for-like” when it comes to computers, however, is a subtle one and one which is unlikely to bother the “gadget-junkies” of this brave new world of ours, but is, actually, a right royal pain in the derriere…

It’s the fact that, in the intervening time, the “operating system” will have been upgraded.

Now you might be thinking “Ooh, exciting! Shiny and new” etc., etc., but, unfortunately, when you’re dealing with a company like A**** and A**** who seem to have a philosophy of never looking back and always embracing the future, what you actually tend to find is that your “like-for-like” replacement won’t do the job any more because many of the programmes that you used to use to do your job will no longer work (sorry, are no longer “supported”) and many of the files that you have created during twenty or more years of creating them will no longer open in the shiny new “upgraded” (and therefore “better”) versions of the software that you have to use.

But then that’s the thing when your corporate philosophy seems more interested in providing shiny new toys for the kids to get for Christmas than in actually providing computer equipment that will do the job to the generations of designers who have embraced your products through the years when everyone else seemed to unable to touch your products with the proverbial barge pole.

The “thinking” of the kids in California seems to not even consider the notion that anyone would possibly want to run “legacy” versions of their most tried and trusted products any more. “Why” they seem to suggest, “Would anyone want to use these ‘older’ products anyway…? And look, here’s a nice shiny new pretty thing you can buy instead to play your music on and everything, dude…”

To me it is an act of supreme corporate arrogance to not only make it impossible for things to run at all on your new systems, to not even include older (“Rosetta” or “Classic”) versions of the software in the bundle that will launch when you need to use these particular items to do your job, and to not even make the option of having them available to anyone who might really need to actually open these older files for whatever reason just seems plain ignorant of how the world of work and design actually functions in the real world and not just up in the “Clouds…”

“I’m sorry, Client, but I can’t open all those files that we worked on for you last year in that massive account that you paid all that money for because our computers no longer support it. Hey, you think you’ve got problems…? None of the games I bought with my own money will play either… Well, I’m sorry you feel like that, Bye, Bye…!”

The ridiculous thing is that they’re so protective of their patents from all the various corporate buyouts that they won’t even release the codes so that someone who wants older version of the packages, or just to run a few of the old packages that they used to regularly use, might be able to find a way of doing so. Instead we just have to “accept” that all that massively expensive software that we once bought is now just so much junk (“Tombstones” I believe is the hip and trendy term which seems to be beautifully derogatory to anyone still wanting to use it) and we should just “embrace the future” even though the future doesn’t do the job half as well and takes far, far longer to achieve less satisfying outcomes…

On a completely unrelated note, when it comes to the future of Graphic Design being in such safe hands, I saw a van as I was driving home the other night with the slogan “Where Number One” emblazoned in huge letters on the side.

I’m assuming that it was a post-modern joke of some kind for a TV show, otherwise, well, maybe the handcart has finally delivered us to hell…

No comments:

Post a Comment